Anonymous · August 11, 2021
Serial Number 21924244 was reported as accurate.
Information Provided by PocketWatchDatabase.com:
https://new.pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/21924451
https://new.pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/elgin/21924451
Access Date: June 3, 2026
From the American Horology Archive:
Elgin National Watch Co.
Grade: 454
Father Time
| Manufacturer: | Elgin | ? |
| Manufacturer Location: | Elgin, Illinois | ? |
| Movement Serial Number: | 21924451 | ? |
| Grade: | 454 | ? |
| Variation: | Father Time | ? |
| Model: | 15 | ? |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1919 | ? |
| Run Quantity: | 1,000 | ? |
| Grade/Model Run: | 44 of 52 | ? |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 64,000 | ? |
| Variant Est. Production: | 64,000 (16S-M15-21J-ONL-U-FATHER TIME) | ? |
| Size: | 16s | ? |
| Jewels: | 21j | ? |
| Jewel Material: | Ruby & Sapphire | ? |
| Jewel Setting: | Gold Settings (Screw-Set) | ? |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | ? |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | ? |
| Movement Setting: | Lever | ? |
| Plate: | 3/4 Plate | ? |
| Double Roller: | Yes | ? |
| Barrel: | Going | ? |
| Train: | Quick | ? |
| Regulator: | Traveling Nut (Spring) | ? |
| Standard Dial Type: | Double-Sunk | ? |
| Adjusted: | Yes | ? |
| Adjusted to Position: | Yes | ? |
| Adjusted # of Positions: | 5 | ? |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | Yes | ? |
| Adjusted to Isochronism: | Yes | ? |
| Railroad Grade: | Yes | ? |
| Wind Indicator Available: | Yes | ? |
| Wind Indicator Present: | Mixed | ? |
| Case: | Various | ? |
| Run ID: | 10886.454G18.16S2694.1615M138.O4563.L2223.21J277 | ? |
| Data Research: | 1927/1950 Elgin Serial List | ? |
| Database Version: | v52.978 | ? |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| Members Only Data. Login or create a free account to unlock. | ||
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only: | 13 (1.30%) | ? |
| $ Estimated Value (12 Month Change): | +4.72% Analyzing 907 Sales | ? |
Continue Your Research
Population Registry for This Run
Total Known Population In Run 13/1,000
Percentage of Total Run 1.30%
|
There are 13 watches in the population registry for this run with 4 images.
Create a FREE account or login to view the population registry and add your watch to the registry. |
Improve the Database
Why Might This Information Be Incorrect?
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification reports help confirm surviving examples and flag data that needs further research.
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been submitted by members in reference to this production run. These reports help verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research.
Anonymous · April 23, 2021
Serial Number 21924244 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 30, 2021
Serial Number 21924539 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 27, 2020
Serial Number 21924087 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 29, 2019
Serial Number 21924696 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 1, 2019
Serial Number 21924860 was reported as accurate.
bogus22 · March 29, 2019
Serial Number 21924860 was reported as accurate.
cmdraven · November 23, 2018
Serial Number 21924639 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 6, 2017
Serial Number 21924110 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff · January 20, 2017
Serial Number 21924110 was reported as accurate.
Gasperoff · January 20, 2017
Serial Number 21924110 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: The wind indicator is present on this watch.
Gasperoff · January 20, 2017
Serial Number 21924110 was reported as accurate.
WhiteGuy56 · January 10, 2017
Serial Number 21924110 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 10, 2017
Serial Number 21924110 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 27, 2016
Serial Number 21924535 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 30, 2016
Serial Number 21924531 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: All is correct except mine does not have a wind indicator.
Anonymous · October 6, 2014
Serial Number 21924176 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: Indicator is present. Otherwise correct.
Anonymous · August 29, 2013
Serial Number 21924090 was reported as accurate.