2mnyboxers · November 13, 2024
Serial Number 389 was reported as accurate.
Information Provided by PocketWatchDatabase.com:
https://new.pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hamilton/110
https://new.pocketwatchdatabase.com/search/result/hamilton/110
Access Date: June 3, 2026
From the American Horology Archive:
Hamilton Watch Co.
Grade: 932
We noticed that you entered a relatively short serial number.
"110" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
"110" could possibly indicate the grade of the watch and not the serial number of your movement. Serial numbers are usually more than a few digits.
Variant A
Private Label(s) in Run:
What is a Private Label?
- Carl W. Anderson & Co. - Manchester, N.H.
- Carl Rivinius - Ebensburg Pa.
- Carl Rivinius, Ebensburg, PA.
What is a Private Label?
| Manufacturer: | Hamilton | ? |
| Manufacturer Location: | Lancaster, Pennsylvania | ? |
| Movement Serial Number: | 110 | ? |
| Grade: | 932 | ? |
| Model: | 1 | ? |
| Estimated Production Year: | 1893 | ? |
| Run Quantity: | 340 | ? |
| Grade/Model Run: | 2 of 4 | ? |
| Grade/Model Total Production: | 600 | ? |
| Size: | 18s | ? |
| Jewels: | 16j | ? |
| Movement Configuration: | Openface | ? |
| Movement Finish: | Nickel | ? |
| Movement Setting: | Lever | ? |
| Plate: | Full Plate | ? |
| Barrel: | Going or Motor | ? |
| Adjusted: | Yes | ? |
| Adjusted to Temperature: | No | ? |
| Railroad Grade: | No | ? |
| Dial Feet Locations: | 2.6, 18.0, 38.2 | ? |
| Case: | Various | ? |
| Run ID: | 4.932G2.18S4.181M4.O4.L4.16J2 | ? |
| Data Research: | 1953 Hamilton Serial List | ? |
| Database Version: | v52.978 | ? |
| Advanced Metrics | ||
| Members Only Data. Login or create a free account to unlock. | ||
| Registry Population: Scoped for This Run Only: | 20 (5.88%) | ? |
|
Research Note: #191: Private Label Marked "Carl W. Anderson & Co. Manchester, N.H." [NAWCC]
|
||
Continue Your Research
Population Registry for This Run
Total Known Population In Run 20/340
Percentage of Total Run 5.88%
|
There are 20 watches in the population registry for this run with 3 images.
Create a FREE account or login to view the population registry and add your watch to the registry. |
Improve the Database
Why Might This Information Be Incorrect?
Does this information describe your movement accurately?
Verification reports help confirm surviving examples and flag data that needs further research.
Verification Reports for this Run
The following reports have been submitted by members in reference to this production run. These reports help verify data and track inaccuracies that require further research.
2mnyboxers · November 13, 2024
Serial Number 64 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 5, 2024
Serial Number 150 was reported as accurate.
cjbrem · December 7, 2023
Serial Number 364 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 9, 2023
Serial Number 393 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · May 11, 2022
Serial Number 67 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 21, 2022
Serial Number 345 was reported as accurate.
Nathan · July 1, 2021
Serial Number 267 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · June 1, 2021
Serial Number 365 was reported as accurate.
Vanna20593 · July 18, 2020
Serial Number 92 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: My watch is marked 17 jewels
Curator Response: Thanks for the report. If possible, please upload an image of the movement to your collection for further evaluation and documentation.
Anonymous · May 10, 2020
Serial Number 385 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 15, 2019
Serial Number 137 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 27, 2019
Serial Number R110 was reported as accurate.
Changes since this report was submitted:
- Grade changed from 923 to 932
- Size changed from 10 to 18
- Jewels changed from 23j to 16j
- Setting changed from Pendant to Lever
- Plate changed from Bridge to Full
Anonymous · August 16, 2019
Serial Number 277 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 14, 2019
Serial Number 119 was reported as accurate.
Gimparoo · July 31, 2019
Serial Number 111 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 7, 2019
Serial Number 232 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 7, 2019
Serial Number 232 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: Hamilton 7 Jewel 18 size sn 232
Curator Response: Thanks for the report. If possible, please upload an image of the movement to your collection for further evaluation and documentation.
Anonymous · November 3, 2018
Serial Number 157 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 30, 2018
Serial Number 157 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 29, 2018
Serial Number 157 was reported as accurate.
Mobilaero · July 28, 2018
Serial Number 344 was reported as accurate.
Gimparoo · April 11, 2018
Serial Number 110 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 25, 2017
Serial Number 399 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · February 15, 2017
Serial Number 301 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 20, 2017
Serial Number 344 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · October 17, 2016
Serial Number 277 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 11, 2016
Serial Number 243 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 2, 2016
Serial Number 191 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 2, 2015
Serial Number 204 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: 17j - not 16j
Curator Response: Hamilton records indicate grade 932 as containing 16 jewels.
Anonymous · November 2, 2015
Serial Number 163 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 2, 2015
Serial Number 76 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · November 2, 2015
Serial Number 171 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 15, 2015
Serial Number 322 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · January 15, 2015
Serial Number 322 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: grade 936 17 jewels
fordcasa · May 11, 2014
Serial Number 390 was reported as accurate.
fordcasa · May 11, 2014
Serial Number 128 was reported as accurate.
fordcasa · May 11, 2014
Serial Number 119 was reported as accurate.
Lpaterson · April 1, 2014
Serial Number 109 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · March 25, 2014
Serial Number 245 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · August 1, 2013
Serial Number 80 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 25, 2013
Serial Number 217 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 22, 2013
Serial Number 364 was reported as inaccurate.
No further details were submitted with the report.
Anonymous · May 22, 2013
Serial Number 282 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · September 24, 2012
Serial Number 75 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: 17 jewels
Anonymous · July 30, 2012
Serial Number 344 was reported as accurate.
Anonymous · July 18, 2012
Serial Number 301 was reported as inaccurate.
Note: 17 jewel not 16
Changes since this report was submitted:
- Plate changed from Unknown to Full